I'm trying to derive (14.25) in Bjorken & Drell (B&D) QFT. This is $$\tag{14.25}U(\epsilon)A^\mu(x)U^{-1}(\epsilon) = A^\mu(x') - \epsilon^{\mu\nu}A_\nu(x') + \frac{\partial \lambda(x',\epsilon)}{\partial x'_\mu},$$ where $\lambda(x',\epsilon)$ is an operator gauge function.
This is all being done in the radiation gauge, i.e. $A_0 = 0$ and $\partial_i A^i=0$, with $i \in {1,2,3}$.
$\epsilon$ is an infinitesimal parameter of a Lorentz transformation $\Lambda$.
Under this transformation, $A^\mu(x) \rightarrow A'^\mu(x')=U(\epsilon)A^\mu(x)U^{-1}(\epsilon)$.
The unitary operator $U$ which generates the infinitesimal Lorentz transformation
$x^{\mu} \rightarrow x'^{\mu} = x^{\mu} + \epsilon^{\mu}_{\nu}x^{\nu}$ is
$U(\epsilon)=1 - \frac{i}{2}\epsilon_{\mu\nu}M^{\mu\nu}$
where $M$ are the generators of Lorentz transformations. (I guess really I should have $M^{\mu\nu}=(M^{\rho\sigma})^{\mu\nu}$. M is a hermitian operator, so
$U^{-1}(\epsilon)=1 + \frac{i}{2}\epsilon_{\mu\nu}M^{\mu\nu}$
Now I tried writing out $U(\epsilon)A^\mu(x)U^{-1}(\epsilon)$ explicitly but it didn't really get me anywhere. The answer is supposed to have $x'$ as the argument of $A^\mu$ on the RHS but I only get $x$. I'm not sure how to Lorentz transform the function and the argument at the same time.
Underneath the formula in B&J it says the gauge term is necessary because $UA_0U^{-1}=0$ since $A_0=0$. I don't see why this warrants the need of a gauge term I'm guessing it's needed because otherwise there will be no conjugate momenta for the $A_0$.
I also want to find what $\lambda$ explicitly is.
No comments:
Post a Comment