It is known that the different spatial components of the angular momentum don't commute with each other. [Lx,Ly]∝Lz[Ly,Lz]∝Lx[Lz,Lx]∝Ly Also it is known that the uncertainty depends on the commutator. ΔLxΔLy≥12|⟨[Lx,Ly]⟩| This makes me wonder. Knowing, say, Lz, how does one put a number on the uncertainty in Ly?
For 1D it is straightforward. Δp=ℏΔx I can figure out Δx, width of the slit, for example, and then know the uncertainty in p.
However, to determine the uncertainty in Ly , I need to know Lx, but because I know Lz there is uncertainty associated with knowing Lx proportional to Ly, since [Lz,Lx]∝Ly. But I don't know Ly!
How would you figure this out?
Answer
For the angular momentum there is no lower bound for the product (ΔLa)ψ(ΔLb)ψ differently from x and p. Indeed there are states ψ such that Laψ=0 for a=x,y,z simultaneously. I am referring to the states with L2ψ=0 which imply (ΔLa)ψ(ΔLb)ψ=0 So you cannot write something like (ΔLx)ψ(ΔLy)ψ≥k for any constant k>0 independent from the state ψ as it happens for x and p. From this example you can see how, generally speaking, there exist simultaneous eigenstates of incompatible observables, even if you cannot find an orthonormal (Hilbert) basis of these vectors.
No comments:
Post a Comment