Sunday, November 11, 2018

general relativity - Geometric meaning of spin connection


A very short question: Does the spin connection that we encounter in General Relativity ωμ,ab have a geometric meaning? I am supposing it does because it comes from mathematical terms that take geometric parts on a manifold but I am not sure how to visualize that?



Answer



The spin connection has a geometric meaning - it is a connection associated to a particular non-coordinate frame, which diagonalizes the metric. Here's how:


Let M be our spacetime. The tangent bundle TM may be thought of as the associated bundle to an SO(n)-principal bundle, where the SO(n) matrices represent ordered orthonormal bases at every point (every column vector is orthonormal to every other in such a matrix, which is the way in which it represents a basis).


The spin connection is now just a so(n)-valued connection 1-form ω on TM, which may locally be expanded as ω=ωμdxμ=ωμabTbadxμ and the ωμab the the connection coefficients physicists usually deal with, and the Tba are a basis for the so(n) matrices, usually the simple antisymmetric matrices with two non-zero entries own would always write down.


Usually, we think of tangent vectors as being expanded as v=vμμ, so the natural basis at every point is given by the coordinates, which may be arbitrarily ugly. in particular, the metric is gμν. We now want to (locally) change frames such that the metric becomes the standard diagonal metric ημν 1 because that one is evidently easier to work with. Such a (local) change of frames is given by a linear invertible map e:TMTM which is given in components by eaμ with ba=eaμvμ for v the components in the coordinate basis and b the components in the diagonal basis. e is called the vielbein. Since TM carries the natural Levi-Civita connection given by the Christoffel symbols Γ, we get a connection on the bundle by ω=eΓe1+ede1 or, in components, ωμab=eaλΓλμνeνb+eaμλeμb which is how one obtains the spin connection. We may think of the spin connection as describing the Levi-Civita connection in a "moving frame" whose motion is given by the vielbein such that the metric takes the simple form we are used to from Euclidean/Minkowski space.




1SO(n) is the Riemannian, SO(1,n1) the Lorentzian case, but there's not much of a difference in the description we have here.



No comments:

Post a Comment

classical mechanics - Moment of a force about a given axis (Torque) - Scalar or vectorial?

I am studying Statics and saw that: The moment of a force about a given axis (or Torque) is defined by the equation: $M_X = (\vec r \times \...